Thinking About Using Non-GAAP Metrics in Your Earnings Release – Read This First

23 Aug

The use of non-GAAP financial measures, which typically make a company’s earnings look stronger than they really are, has increased significantly in recent years. The creative use of these measures, and the prominence companies are giving them in their earnings releases, has prompted the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance to update its Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on the use of non-GAAP measures to provide more explicit guidance on when such measures may be misleading. The SEC staff has gone even further, issuing warnings in public speeches to companies that abuse non-GAAP measures.   While the average number of comment letters issued by the SEC staff has decreased about 20% since 2010, the SEC has indicated that it will be issuing comment letters to companies that fail to comply with its guidance. This suggests that the recent period of relative inactivity in the number of routine comment letters issued by the staff may be over, instead replaced by more focused reviews of disclosure issues of particular concern – such as abuse of non-GAAP financial measures.

So what constitutes misleading non-GAAP financial measures? The SEC gave numerous examples, including:

  • Excluding normal, recurring cash operating expenses necessary to operate the company’s business;
  • If non-GAAP measures are presented inconsistently between periods without adequate disclosure of the change and explanation of reasons for the change; and
  • Excluding non-recurring charges but not including non-recurring gains.

In addition to focusing on the non-GAAP measures themselves to ensure they’re compliant, management should pay particular attention to ensuring that non-GAAP measures are not more prominently presented than comparable GAAP measures. Non-exclusive examples of actionable disclosure given by the staff include:

  • Omitting comparable GAAP measures from an earnings release headline or caption that includes non-GAAP measures;
  • Presenting a non-GAAP measure using a style of presentation (e.g., bold or larger font) that emphasizes the non-GAAP measure over the comparable GAAP measure;
  • Presenting a non-GAAP measure before the most directly comparable GAAP measure, including in an earnings release headline or caption;
  • Describing non-GAAP measure in terms that suggest, for example, “record performance” or “exceptional performance” without an equally prominent descriptive characterization of the comparable GAAP measure; and
  • Providing a discussion and analysis of a non-GAAP measure without a similar discussion and analysis of the comparable GAAP measure in a location with equal or greater prominence.

Mark Kronforst, the Division of Corporation Finance’s chief accountant, has done us all a favor by suggesting that companies have an opportunity to “self-correct” their disclosures. Management should heed his advice and carefully review draft earnings releases in light of the recent guidance, therefore avoiding an unwelcome comment from the staff, or worse, an investigation alleging misleading disclosure.

Don’t Think You Have to Worry About Timely Reporting Securities Transactions with the SEC? Think Again.

15 Sep
By: Jessica R. Sudweeks

Officers, directors and major stockholders of publicly traded companies often casually comply with the reporting requirements of Section 13 (Schedules 13D and 13G) and Section 16 (Forms 3, 4 and 5) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (also known as the Exchange Act), if at all. Thus far, this complacent attitude has not resulted in aggressive enforcement action by the SEC, until now.

Continue reading

The SEC Speaks – XBRL in Focus!

8 Sep
By: Nicole E. York

The SEC Staff Issues Comment Letters

Since the inception of XBRL in 2009, the goal of the SEC has been to create a uniform system that would become a tool for investors to compare and analyze company financial statements. A phase-in period was afforded to companies that would need time to adjust to a system that came with certain labor and financial burdens, especially for smaller reporting companies. This grace period has long since come to an end, and for a while, the only noise regarding compliance came from certain filing agents attempting to drum up business by pointing out errors in XBRL files.  Now the SEC has begun to weigh in on irregularities, and errors in XBRL submissions, beginning with a comment letter sent to certain public companies in July 2014.  In that letter, a sample of which the SEC has posted at, the SEC highlighted two common XBRL errors – calculation relationships and custom element data tagging.

Continue reading